VDM
VDM came face to face with Blord in court this morning and, in a moment of unfiltered hubris, blurted out the truth that good lawyers spend decades trying to hide:
“It’s not about you anymore, BLORD. It’s a matter of pride now. It’s about Sowore. I want to show him that he cannot do anything. I want him to know.”
Pause and read that again. Slowly. That single statement is not bravado; it is a signed, sealed and delivered confession of abuse of court process.
Now let me serve him the intellectual and legal blows he invited.
👇 1. PRIDE IS NOT A CAUSE OF ACTION.
You don’t file a case because your ego is bruised. You file to vindicate a legal right or seek redress for a legal wrong. The moment VDM said “It’s not about you anymore, BLORD… It’s about Sowore,” he officially informed the court that the original dispute is dead. What is left is a personal vendetta against a man who is not even a party to the suit. In law, that is called ulterior motive, and it is fatal to any claim.
👇 2. THE COURT IS NOT YOUR PRIVATE GLADIATOR RING.
“I want to show him that he cannot do anything.” Who? Sowore. Why? “A matter of pride.” When you reduce the hallowed chamber of justice to a stage for proving a point to a third party, you insult the bench. The judge’s role is to apply the law impartially, not to serve as a prop in VDM’s ego drama. He is asking the judiciary to become his personal “I told you so” machine. That is contemptuous before it is even illegal.
👇 3. BLACK’S LAW DICTIONARY JUST SLAPPED HIM.
Abuse of process: “The improper and tortious use of a legitimately issued court process to obtain a result that is either unlawful or beyond the process’s scope.” VDM’s purpose is now to “show” Sowore and feed his pride. That result is not within the legal scope of any known proceeding in this country. He has magically converted a lawsuit into psychological warfare by admission.
👇 4. HE ADMITTED THE CASE IS NO LONGER ABOUT THE DEFENDANT.
If it’s not about Blord anymore, the lis (the genuine dispute) between them is extinguished. Courts exist to settle actual controversies, not to soothe hurt feelings. A case that abandons its legal foundation and mutates into a proxy war for a spectator (Sowore) is dead on arrival. In sane jurisprudence, it must be dismissed in limine for being an abuse.
👇 5. “I WANT HIM TO KNOW” IS THE LANGUAGE OF A BULLY, NOT A RIGHTS-SEEKER.
The rule of law does not exist to teach Sowore—or anyone—that they “cannot do anything.” That phrase reeks of an authoritarian fantasy where the judiciary is conscripted to silence a citizen. Sowore remains a full rights-bearing Nigerian, and no court should lend its voice to VDM’s personal redemption tour. The courtroom is not a place where one man gets to scream “I have shown you!”
👇 6. THE JUDGE’S ROLE AND THE PURPOSE OF COURT, OPENLY MOCKED.
The judge’s role? To serve the public interest in impartial justice. The purpose of court? The vindication of rights and redress of wrongs. VDM’s statement renders both obligations meaningless. He has asked the court to abandon its constitutional function and become a tool for interpersonal pride-settling. That is the very definition of scandalising the administration of justice.
👊 CONCLUSION: A VERDICT DELIVERED BY HIS OWN LIPS.
VDM didn’t need a cross-examiner today; he demolished himself. He has told the world, in plain words, that his matter is not grounded in law but in ego, not directed at the defendant but at a spectator, and not aimed at justice but at a boast. Every law student learns that an admission against interest is the best evidence. This one is a judicial nightmare—for him.
The only reasonable thing left for any judge who values the dignity of the court is to see this statement and declare the entire exercise a grotesque abuse of process. Pride may have driven him there, but the law must slap him awake.
Let this sink in. Share it until it reaches the four walls of that courtroom. Intellectual black and blue, no mercy. 📚⚖️
#RuleOfLaw #AbuseOfProcess #VDM #Blord #Sowore #JudicialIntegrity #LawAndPrideDontMix
