Former presidential candidate and chieftain of the African Democratic Congress, Peter Obi, has criticised the recommendation of a ₦10 million fine against politicians with dual party membership and the removal of certificate forgery, age falsification, and false declarations as grounds for challenging an election in a tribunal.
Obi expressed his concerns in a statement posted on X on Friday.
Obi Says Amendment Contradicts Nigeria’s Constitution
According to Obi, removing certificate forgery as a ground for election petitions contradicts the provisions of the Constitution of Nigeria 1999.
He accused the administration of Bola Ahmed Tinubu of promoting actions that undermine democratic integrity.
“Nigeria is facing a troubling contradiction. The same lawmakers who have proposed a fine of ₦10 million and up to two years in prison for dual political party membership have simultaneously removed certificate forgery, age falsification, and false declarations as grounds for challenging an election in a tribunal. This is in direct contradiction to the provisions of the Constitution of Nigeria (1999, as amended).
“A nation cannot rise above the integrity of its leaders. If we truly want a better Nigeria, our laws must defend truth, character, competence, and accountability. We cannot continue to tolerate criminal behavior,” the politician stated.
House of Representatives Amended Electoral Act 2026
The House of Representatives of Nigeria on Wednesday amended the Electoral Act 2026 to prohibit individuals from belonging to more than one political party.
The move came amid widespread public reactions over the removal of certificate forgery as a ground for challenging election outcomes at tribunals.
Obi Warns Against Deception in Public Office
Obi said the development raises important questions about the priorities of Nigeria’s political system.
“In any serious democracy, the gravest offence in public life is deceiving the people to gain power. Submitting false documents, falsifying one’s age, forging certificates, and making dishonest declarations to electoral authorities are among the most serious offenses in any democracy. Such actions not only lead to automatic disqualification but also warrant criminal prosecution,” the ADC chieftain added.
Obi Says Electoral Laws Must Strengthen Democracy
The former presidential candidate argued that Nigeria’s electoral system appears more focused on protecting political structures rather than promoting transparency and accountability.
“There is no justification for prioritising punishment for party alignment over punishing false certificates, forgery, and other forms of deception in the pursuit of public office.”
He insisted that laws should strengthen democracy rather than weaken it, adding that legislation should promote ethical leadership and higher standards for those seeking public office.
What This Means for Nigeria’s Electoral System
The debate surrounding the Electoral Act amendment highlights growing concerns about electoral integrity in Nigeria.
Political analysts say legal provisions governing elections are critical to ensuring transparency, accountability, and public trust in democratic institutions.
Frequently Asked Questions
What change was made to the Electoral Act 2026?
The amendment removes certificate forgery, age falsification, and false declarations as grounds for challenging an election result at a tribunal.
What punishment was proposed for dual party membership?
Lawmakers proposed a ₦10 million fine and up to two years in prison for politicians who belong to more than one political party.
Why did Peter Obi criticise the amendment?
Peter Obi said the amendment contradicts the 1999 Constitution of Nigeria and weakens accountability in the electoral system.
Last Updated: March 14, 2026
About The Author
